Re: Breaks LSI RAID on C600 chipset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Do you think the latest version at
http://git.neil.brown.name/?p=mdadm.git;a=summary is stable enough to
use?   It definitely fixes the major issue (losing the raid config)
from the prior version.

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:26 AM, David F. <df7729@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> 1) The update did fix the broken RAID.  I can reboot and the RAID
> mirror still exists after reboots.
>
> 2) I do want to report that on the first test, the reboot was clean.
> On the second reboot there was a warning message about the BIOS
> detecting "Inconsistent Timestamps" on one of the drives and something
> about which CONFIG the BIOS would use.  I didn't have time to get it
> all jotted down.  Whatever it used was still okay since the RAID
> mirror was still there after that message.
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:35 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:31:26 -0700 "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> any progress or more information needed on this?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:39 PM, David F. <df7729@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > If you need access to the system, a network kvm is available - or if
>>> > you have a C600 based system, you should see the same problem there.
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, David F. <df7729@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> Okay, and to confirm, this is happening on other C600 based systems.
>>> >> Boot to Linux with MDADM raid support and the raid is gone after
>>> >> reboot.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:50 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:13:05 -0700 "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Hello,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I built a new system, installed new drives (no partitioning, just raw
>>> >>>> new drives), configured RAID 1, boot to linux, created reports
>>> >>>> attached.  Rebooted and the system doesn't see any configured raid
>>> >>>> drives (just the two raw drives).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks.  I might take a look, but I would greatly prefer it if you kept the
>>> >>> linux-raid list on the Cc.....
>>> >>>
>>> >>> NeilBrown
>>> >>>
>>
>> I must confess that I haven't even looked at it.
>> But I just saw and email on linux-raid from Martin Wilck:
>>
>>  Subject: [PATCH] DDF: _write_super_to_disk: fix anchor header type
>>
>> which very likely fixes your problem.  I've applied it and pushed out to
>>    git://neil.brown.name/mdadm/
>>
>> NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux