It is not incorrect to call handle_stripe_fill() when
a batch of full-stripe writes is active.
It is, however, a BUG if fetch_block() then decides
it needs to actually fetch anything.
So move the 'BUG_ON' to where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Fixes: 59fc630b8b5f ("RAID5: batch adjacent full stripe write")
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 91a1e8b26b52..415cac6d89bd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3302,6 +3302,7 @@ static int fetch_block(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s,
*/
BUG_ON(test_bit(R5_Wantcompute, &dev->flags));
BUG_ON(test_bit(R5_Wantread, &dev->flags));
+ BUG_ON(sh->batch_head);
if ((s->uptodate == disks - 1) &&
(s->failed && (disk_idx == s->failed_num[0] ||
disk_idx == s->failed_num[1]))) {
@@ -3370,7 +3371,6 @@ static void handle_stripe_fill(struct stripe_head *sh,
{
int i;
- BUG_ON(sh->batch_head);
/* look for blocks to read/compute, skip this if a compute
* is already in flight, or if the stripe contents are in the
* midst of changing due to a write
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
