Re: Paranoid mode for RAID-1 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry for jumping in late - but let's say it does "work" and a drive returns an error, is that data lost ? Or which drive is "right"?

Sent from my iPhone

> On 27/04/2015, at 18:37, Jean-Baptiste Thomas <cau2jeaf1honoq@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I'm looking for a way to get MD to operate in a mode in which
> reading a sector from a RAID-1 device would not succeed until it
> got matching data from at least two components.
> 
> Recent experience[1] suggests that a transient problem in one
> disk can completely hose a four way RAID-1 array, which is
> otherwise supposed to still be fine after a triple total
> failure. I'm hoping that a paranoid mode would have prevented
> that.
> 
> If there is such a thing, PLEASE tell me. If not, please tell me 
> so I don't waste any more time looking for it.
> 
> [1] "Massive RAID-1 desync"
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg48681.html
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=143003812706563&w=2
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux