Re: RAID 5 "magicaly" become a RAID0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Add a "--force" to the --assemble command and it should force the
other 2 online even though they are a bit off on events.

>From my understanding that may been some of the last data written
could be lost/corrupted (those last 4 events on those 2 disks).

I would probably also suggest getting another disk and going to raid6,
raid5 is pretty scary if disks start going bad.

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Thomas MARCHESSEAU
<marchesseau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi team ,
>
> Like probably lot of  new subscriber , i mail you, guys,  for help .
>
> Iąm running a raid5 on 7 HDD for several month now ( and years on other
> system) without problem .
> last week i had a crash disk (sdg)  , iąve add a new drive (sdi)  and
> rebuild ..  Works fine , and i dont think this is the cause of my today
> problem.
>
> Yesterday , iąv upgraded my ubuntu 14.10 , and the system warm me with a
> message that i canąt recall and rewrite exactly , but something like :
> md127 doesnąt not match with /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf ,  blah blah , run
> /usr/share/mdadm/mkconf , and fix /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
>
> iąve done it , and reboot , all looks good .
> All the drive have been rename after reboot ( orginal sdg was extract form
> the bay )
>
> Iąve setup a rsync of my most important data on a external drive this
> night, who partially failed  (only 25% ha been backuped , bad luck )  ,
> (probably) because  this morning  i have re-inserted by mistake the faulty
> drive ( for information , i think the drive was in fact ok , the sata
> connector was a bit disconnect )
>
> I did not pay attention of the situation at the moment , but few hour
> later , i ssh my filer and my « home »  (on the raid partition) was not
> available anymore .
> I didnąt try to fschk or any thing else than :
>
> Mdadm ‹stop /dev/md127
> mdadm --assemble /dev/md127 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf
> /dev/sdg /dev/sdh
> mdadm: /dev/md127 assembled from 5 drives - not enough to start the array.
>
>
> So iąve read a bunch of usefull link , one of them :) ,
> https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RAID_Recovery  , says , donąt do
> stupid thing until drop a mail on linux-raid mailling Š so iąm here  .
>
> iąve collected  this usefull info :
> mdadm --examine /dev/sd[a-z] | egrep 'Event|/dev/sd'
> /dev/sda: (system HDD )
> /dev/sdb:
>          Events : 21958
> /dev/sdc:
>          Events : 21958
> /dev/sdd:
>          Events : 21958
> /dev/sde:
>          Events : 21958
> /dev/sdf:
>          Events : 21958
> /dev/sdg:
>          Events : 21954  <‹ here
> /dev/sdh:
>          Events : 21954  <‹ and here
>
>
>
> iąve also a full copy of mdadm ‹examine
>
> The strange thing is that  my raid array is now seen as a RAID0 in
> mdadm --detail /dev/md127
> /dev/md127:
>         Version :
>      Raid Level : raid0
>   Total Devices : 0
>
>           State : inactive
>
>
> But individually all drive in mdadm ‹examine , are RAID 5 member .
>
> Anyone for help  ?
>
> ią was on the way to perform a
> mdadm --create --assume-clean ‹level=5 --raid-devices=7 --size=11720300544
> /dev/md127 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh
>
> Which looks a bit stupid before ask for help
>
> Regards thomas
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux