Re: is mdadm RAID1 disk full sync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 22/03/2015 23:29, lingli tang wrote:
Thanks very much.
I will try DRBD later
But I want to figure this out.

I have export disk using tgtd and load disk on another server using
iscsiadm with infiniband  of iser protocol.
Does ISCSI/Iser have any cache on it.
Can you test that by removing the local disk from the MD array, or changing your test so writes are directly to the remote device. Then run the test, shutdown, and check the remote disk to see if it has all the expected data, or still only some of the expected data. This will remove MD as a suspect. Continue to try and get "closer" to the remote until you can find the culprit. You might also use tcpdump or similar to sniff the network, which will tell you if the expected data is being sent to the remote (and when).

Sorry, I don't know anywhere near enough to comment on things like infiniband/iser, but these are the steps I would look into. Hope that it is helpful.

PS, I do use DRBD, and iSCSI, and it has been working well in my environment for the last year or so, I have no commercial interest/benefit from you using it, just a happy customer.

Regards,
Adam

2015-03-22 15:28 GMT+08:00 Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On 22/03/2015 16:00, lingli tang wrote:
Thanks for reply.

I have create a raid1 with two fusion io PCIe flash disk:
mdadm --create /dev/md/master --name=master --level=1 --raid-devices=2
/dev/fioa2 /dev/mapper/mpathc
/dev/fioa2 is local disk on server A and /dev/mapper/mpathc is a iscsi
load disk export from server B.

After that we mkfs.ext4 on /dev/md/master and mount with 'sync' option on
/data1
and we will run mysql binlog on it.
In order to avoid data loss  of mysql binlog we have set
sync_binlog=1. so every sql commit will call fsync() to flush to disk.

according to your description. if we reboot the server A, the two disk
data on different server will be the same.
but after the server A restarted, we assemble the two disk on two
server, data is different on the two server, disk on server B lost
more than one sql commit.

I have checked it with strace 'mysqld' on Server A.
I found a sql commit and fsync() on binlog file handle on server A but
this sql can not find in assembled disk on server B.

I also test it with two SAS disk, Server B still has more than one sql
commit lost.
Sounds like you might be better using something like DRBD (www.drbd.org)
which has different modes, one of which will do what you are asking (not
respond until both systems have confirmed the data is written to the local
disk).

In your current case, even if md is correctly writing to both underlying
'devices' you have multiple layers under one of the devices, so you should
confirm that *all* of those layers are properly passing through the data
without any caching/etc.

Regards,
Adam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux