On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:39:42 +0100 Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/25/2015 06:15 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On 02/25/2015 01:29 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: > >>> Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>>> On 02/24/2015 10:00 PM, Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>>>> From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> > >>>>> This avoids adding the same orom entry to the oroms list multiple > >>>>> times, as the comparison of pointers is never going to succeed, in > >>>>> particular when '*orom' points to a local stack variable in the > >>>>> calling function. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> platform-intel.c | 4 ++-- > >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/platform-intel.c b/platform-intel.c > >>>>> index 37274da..a4ffa9f 100644 > >>>>> --- a/platform-intel.c > >>>>> +++ b/platform-intel.c > >>>>> @@ -255,8 +255,8 @@ static const struct imsm_orom *add_orom(const struct imsm_orom *orom) > >>>>> int i; > >>>>> > >>>>> for (i = 0; i < SYS_DEV_MAX; i++) { > >>>>> - if (&oroms[i].orom == orom) > >>>>> - return orom; > >>>>> + if (!memcmp(&oroms[i].orom, orom, sizeof(struct imsm_orom))) > >>>>> + return &oroms[i].orom; > >>>>> if (oroms[i].orom.signature[0] == 0) { > >>>>> oroms[i].orom = *orom; > >>>>> return &oroms[i].orom; > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi Jes, > >>>> > >>>> You are right that this can add the same entry multiple times, but this > >>>> is how it is supposed to work. The oroms list should contain all the > >>>> platform's oroms and they can be the same, this is why memcmp() should > >>>> not be used here. We don't want to compare the contents of the > >>>> structure, just its address. Sorry if it's not clear. > >>> > >>> Artur, > >>> > >>> Then the code is fundamentally broken, since you end up comparing a > >>> stack variable against the oroms array when you call it from > >>> find_imsm_efi(). Worse you can end up returning the local stack variable > >>> declared in find_imsm_efi() to the calling function - there is no way > >>> that can be correct. > >>> > >>> Look at this: > >>> > >>> static const struct imsm_orom *add_orom(const struct imsm_orom *orom) > >>> { > >>> int i; > >>> > >>> for (i = 0; i < SYS_DEV_MAX; i++) { > >>> if (&oroms[i].orom == orom) > >>> return orom; > >>> if (oroms[i].orom.signature[0] == 0) { > >>> oroms[i].orom = *orom; > >>> return &oroms[i].orom; > >>> } > >>> } > >>> return NULL; > >>> } > >>> > >>> const struct imsm_orom *find_imsm_efi(struct sys_dev *hba) > >>> { > >>> struct imsm_orom orom; > >>> const struct imsm_orom *ret; > >>> int err; > >>> > >>> .... > >>> > >>> ret = add_orom(&orom); > >>> add_orom_device_id(ret, hba->dev_id); > >>> > >>> return ret; > >>> } > >> > >> I can't see how this can lead to returning a stack variable. The oroms > >> array is global and add_orom() will always return a pointer to a struct > >> in this array. This comparison will always fail when we pass a pointer > >> to a stack variable to add_orom(): > >> > >> if (&oroms[i].orom == orom) > >> return orom; > >> > >> This was meant to prevent adding an orom again like this: > >> > >> ret = add_orom(&orom); > >> add_orom(ret); > >> > >> Maybe it would be more appropriate to return NULL to indicate that > >> nothing was added instead of returning back the same pointer. I can do a > >> patch for this. What do you think? > > > > It will fail because we know we're comparing a stack pointer, but it > > raises red flags with tools like coverity and it is really bad coding > > practice to rely on hacks like this. > > > > I also don't understand why you want to keep a table of identical > > entries in the orom structure if multiple identical entries are found. > > Each entry ought to match onto a specific physical controller, unless I > > get something wrong? > > > > OK, you're right, it is a hack. I thought it over and redesigned those > orom functions. This should make it simpler and more consistent. > > Thanks, > Artur > > >From 673ecf1c0539f0050cc5934203af6d79cd68234d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:34:20 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] imsm: simplified multiple OROMs support > > Replaced oroms array with list, add_orom() now only appends to this list > and add_orom_device_id() only appends devid_list node to an orom_entry. > > Signed-off-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > platform-intel.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- > platform-intel.h | 4 ++- > super-intel.c | 18 +++++------ > 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/platform-intel.c b/platform-intel.c > index 37274da..9c89c20 100644 > --- a/platform-intel.c > +++ b/platform-intel.c > @@ -229,65 +229,61 @@ struct pciExpDataStructFormat { > __u16 devListOffset; > } __attribute__ ((packed)); > > -static struct orom_entry oroms[SYS_DEV_MAX]; > - > -const struct orom_entry *get_oroms(void) > -{ > - return (const struct orom_entry *)&oroms; > -} > +struct orom_entry *orom_entries; > > const struct imsm_orom *get_orom_by_device_id(__u16 dev_id) > { > - int i; > - struct devid_list *list; > + struct orom_entry *entry; > + struct devid_list *devid; > > - for (i = 0; i < SYS_DEV_MAX; i++) { > - for (list = oroms[i].devid_list; list; list = list->next) { > - if (list->devid == dev_id) > - return &oroms[i].orom; > + for (entry = orom_entries; entry; entry = entry->next) { > + for (devid = entry->devid_list; devid; devid = devid->next) { > + if (devid->devid == dev_id) > + return &entry->orom; > } > } > + > return NULL; > } > > -static const struct imsm_orom *add_orom(const struct imsm_orom *orom) > +static struct orom_entry *add_orom(const struct imsm_orom *orom) > { > - int i; > - > - for (i = 0; i < SYS_DEV_MAX; i++) { > - if (&oroms[i].orom == orom) > - return orom; > - if (oroms[i].orom.signature[0] == 0) { > - oroms[i].orom = *orom; > - return &oroms[i].orom; > - } > - } > - return NULL; > + struct orom_entry *list; > + struct orom_entry *prev = NULL; > + > + for (list = orom_entries; list; prev = list, list = list->next) > + ; > + > + list = xmalloc(sizeof(struct orom_entry)); > + list->orom = *orom; > + list->devid_list = NULL; > + list->next = NULL; > + > + if (prev == NULL) > + orom_entries = list; > + else > + prev->next = list; > + > + return list; > } > > -static void add_orom_device_id(const struct imsm_orom *orom, __u16 dev_id) > +static void add_orom_device_id(struct orom_entry *entry, __u16 dev_id) > { > - int i; > struct devid_list *list; > struct devid_list *prev = NULL; > > - for (i = 0; i < SYS_DEV_MAX; i++) { > - if (&oroms[i].orom == orom) { > - for (list = oroms[i].devid_list; list; prev = list, list = list->next) { > - if (list->devid == dev_id) > - return; > - } > - list = xmalloc(sizeof(struct devid_list)); > - list->devid = dev_id; > - list->next = NULL; > - > - if (prev == NULL) > - oroms[i].devid_list = list; > - else > - prev->next = list; > + for (list = entry->devid_list; list; prev = list, list = list->next) { > + if (list->devid == dev_id) > return; > - } > } > + list = xmalloc(sizeof(struct devid_list)); > + list->devid = dev_id; > + list->next = NULL; > + > + if (prev == NULL) > + entry->devid_list = list; > + else > + prev->next = list; > } > > static int scan(const void *start, const void *end, const void *data) > @@ -321,7 +317,7 @@ static int scan(const void *start, const void *end, const void *data) > if (!imsm_mem) > return 0; > > - const struct imsm_orom *orom = add_orom(imsm_mem); > + struct orom_entry *orom = add_orom(imsm_mem); > > if (ptr->devListOffset) { > const __u16 *dev_list = (void *)ptr + ptr->devListOffset; > @@ -367,11 +363,11 @@ const struct imsm_orom *imsm_platform_test(struct sys_dev *hba) > IMSM_OROM_RLC_RAID10; > } > > - const struct imsm_orom *ret = add_orom(&orom); > + struct orom_entry *ret = add_orom(&orom); > > add_orom_device_id(ret, hba->dev_id); > > - return ret; > + return &ret->orom; > } > > static const struct imsm_orom *find_imsm_hba_orom(struct sys_dev *hba) > @@ -508,7 +504,7 @@ static int read_efi_variable(void *buffer, ssize_t buf_size, char *variable_name > const struct imsm_orom *find_imsm_efi(struct sys_dev *hba) > { > struct imsm_orom orom; > - const struct imsm_orom *ret; > + struct orom_entry *ret; > int err; > > if (check_env("IMSM_TEST_AHCI_EFI") || check_env("IMSM_TEST_SCU_EFI")) > @@ -529,14 +525,14 @@ const struct imsm_orom *find_imsm_efi(struct sys_dev *hba) > > /* try to read variable for combined AHCI controllers */ > if (err && hba->type == SYS_DEV_SATA) { > - static const struct imsm_orom *csata; > + static struct orom_entry *csata; > > err = read_efi_variable(&orom, sizeof(orom), AHCI_CSATA_PROP, VENDOR_GUID); > if (!err) { > if (!csata) > csata = add_orom(&orom); > add_orom_device_id(csata, hba->dev_id); > - return csata; > + return &csata->orom; > } > } > > @@ -546,12 +542,12 @@ const struct imsm_orom *find_imsm_efi(struct sys_dev *hba) > ret = add_orom(&orom); > add_orom_device_id(ret, hba->dev_id); > > - return ret; > + return &ret->orom; > } > > const struct imsm_orom *find_imsm_nvme(struct sys_dev *hba) > { > - static const struct imsm_orom *nvme_orom; > + static struct orom_entry *nvme_orom; > > if (hba->type != SYS_DEV_NVME) > return NULL; > @@ -574,7 +570,7 @@ const struct imsm_orom *find_imsm_nvme(struct sys_dev *hba) > nvme_orom = add_orom(&nvme_orom_compat); > } > add_orom_device_id(nvme_orom, hba->dev_id); > - return nvme_orom; > + return &nvme_orom->orom; > } > > const struct imsm_orom *find_imsm_capability(struct sys_dev *hba) > diff --git a/platform-intel.h b/platform-intel.h > index 2ead431..631fa76 100644 > --- a/platform-intel.h > +++ b/platform-intel.h > @@ -213,8 +213,11 @@ struct devid_list { > struct orom_entry { > struct imsm_orom orom; > struct devid_list *devid_list; > + struct orom_entry *next; > }; > > +extern struct orom_entry *orom_entries; > + > static inline char *guid_str(char *buf, struct efi_guid guid) > { > sprintf(buf, "%02x%02x%02x%02x-%02x%02x-%02x%02x-%02x%02x-%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x", > @@ -235,6 +238,5 @@ int devt_attached_to_hba(dev_t dev, const char *hba_path); > char *devt_to_devpath(dev_t dev); > int path_attached_to_hba(const char *disk_path, const char *hba_path); > const char *get_sys_dev_type(enum sys_dev_type); > -const struct orom_entry * get_oroms(void); > const struct imsm_orom *get_orom_by_device_id(__u16 device_id); > struct sys_dev *device_by_id(__u16 device_id); > diff --git a/super-intel.c b/super-intel.c > index 819e0da..53269fd 100644 > --- a/super-intel.c > +++ b/super-intel.c > @@ -1948,13 +1948,12 @@ static int detail_platform_imsm(int verbose, int enumerate_only, char *controlle > return result; > } > > - const struct orom_entry *oroms = get_oroms(); > - int i; > + const struct orom_entry *entry; > > - for (i = 0; i < SYS_DEV_MAX && oroms[i].devid_list; i++) { > - print_imsm_capability(&oroms[i].orom); > + for (entry = orom_entries; entry; entry = entry->next) { > + print_imsm_capability(&entry->orom); > > - if (imsm_orom_is_nvme(&oroms[i].orom)) { > + if (imsm_orom_is_nvme(&entry->orom)) { > for (hba = list; hba; hba = hba->next) { > if (hba->type == SYS_DEV_NVME) > printf(" NVMe Device : %s\n", hba->path); > @@ -1963,7 +1962,7 @@ static int detail_platform_imsm(int verbose, int enumerate_only, char *controlle > } > > struct devid_list *devid; > - for (devid = oroms[i].devid_list; devid; devid = devid->next) { > + for (devid = entry->devid_list; devid; devid = devid->next) { > hba = device_by_id(devid->devid); > if (!hba) > continue; > @@ -2007,11 +2006,10 @@ static int export_detail_platform_imsm(int verbose, char *controller_path) > result = 0; > } > > - const struct orom_entry *oroms = get_oroms(); > - int i; > + const struct orom_entry *entry; > > - for (i = 0; i < SYS_DEV_MAX && oroms[i].devid_list; i++) > - print_imsm_capability_export(&oroms[i].orom); > + for (entry = orom_entries; entry; entry = entry->next) > + print_imsm_capability_export(&entry->orom); > > return result; > } Applied, thanks. NeilBrown
Attachment:
pgpb7Mt9oIgYO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature