Re: kernel refuses devices mdadm -E accepts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Kernel version 3.17.8 and mdadm version 3.3.2.
> There have been many bug fixes to mdadm since that kernel was retired.

Really? I will give that a shot.

> Show us the output of that if it doesn't work (it should resume your
> reshape).

I will try that.

It was totally stupid reshape, I was changing the "data-offset" to
align it. Really unnecessary, and really slow, so I feel like an idiot
for starting it.

>> Thanks for any help. If I lose this array, I am going to face a lot of grief...
> I shouldn't have to say this, but RAID is for availability, not for data
> security.  You still need a backup system for any important data.

Sure. The really vital (and small) stuff I have backed up elsewhere,
but the sheer volume of raw video my girlfriend records is not
economically feasible to backup beyond raid+btrfs snapshots.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux