The world thanks you. :) Killian De Volder On 11-08-14 02:40, NeilBrown wrote: > On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:32:54 +0200 Killian De Volder > <killian.de.volder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> sdb2 worked ! (And sorry for not trying sdb2, mdadm asks for /dev/md? so you naturally write /dev/sd? for the disk thereafter too :) ) >> Now the question should -r failed work ? > Yes it "should", but it appears that I broke it for mdadm 3.3. > It'll be fixed in 3.3.2 by > http://git.neil.brown.name/?p=mdadm.git;a=commitdiff;h=b47024f1c5fde5d4fbc65807b9b29e06c056584e > and a couple of prior commits. > > Thanks, > NeilBrown > > >> Killian De Volder >> >> On 09-08-14 10:23, NeilBrown wrote: >>> On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 09:52:09 +0200 Killian De Volder >>> <killian.de.volder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Doesn't work since sdb has been ejected. Strace below. >>>> >>>> package manager: mdadm 3.3-r2 >>>> #mdadm -V: mdadm - v3.3 - 3rd September 2013 >>>> >>>> Just tried 3.3-r3 and 3.2.6-r1 same issue. >>>> (There are no older in the package manager to try fast.) >>>> >>>> #strace mdadm /dev/md126 -r /dev/sdb2 >>> I note that you put "/dev/sdb2" on the end of the line. >>> >>> >>>>> How about >>>>> mdadm /dev/md127 -r sdb2 >>> I note that I just put "sdb2" on the end of the line. Perhaps I should have >>> been explicit and say 'not "/dev/sdb2", just "sdb2"'. It does make a >>> difference. >>> >>> NeilBrown >>> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
