On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:32:54 +0200 Killian De Volder <killian.de.volder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > sdb2 worked ! (And sorry for not trying sdb2, mdadm asks for /dev/md? so you naturally write /dev/sd? for the disk thereafter too :) ) > Now the question should -r failed work ? Yes it "should", but it appears that I broke it for mdadm 3.3. It'll be fixed in 3.3.2 by http://git.neil.brown.name/?p=mdadm.git;a=commitdiff;h=b47024f1c5fde5d4fbc65807b9b29e06c056584e and a couple of prior commits. Thanks, NeilBrown > > Killian De Volder > > On 09-08-14 10:23, NeilBrown wrote: > > On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 09:52:09 +0200 Killian De Volder > > <killian.de.volder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Doesn't work since sdb has been ejected. Strace below. > >> > >> package manager: mdadm 3.3-r2 > >> #mdadm -V: mdadm - v3.3 - 3rd September 2013 > >> > >> Just tried 3.3-r3 and 3.2.6-r1 same issue. > >> (There are no older in the package manager to try fast.) > >> > >> #strace mdadm /dev/md126 -r /dev/sdb2 > > I note that you put "/dev/sdb2" on the end of the line. > > > > > >>> How about > >>> mdadm /dev/md127 -r sdb2 > > I note that I just put "sdb2" on the end of the line. Perhaps I should have > > been explicit and say 'not "/dev/sdb2", just "sdb2"'. It does make a > > difference. > > > > NeilBrown > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
