Re: Array created by mdadm 3.2 & 3.3 have different array size, why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Larry Fenske <LFenske <at> SGI.com> writes:

> 
> Your RAID 6 array has an internal bitmap, while your RAID 5 array does not.

When creating array, I didn't specified bitmap options (don't know what it
is), so is it different behavior between v3.2 and v3.3, or it's just the 
compile parameters are different between CentOS 6 and Fedora 19/20?

> 
> - Larry Fenske
> SGI signature
> 
> Senior Software Engineer
> SGI
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo <at> vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux