Re: Array created by mdadm 3.2 & 3.3 have different array size, why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tide <lovetide@xxxxxx>, linux-raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Array created by mdadm 3.2 & 3.3 have different array size, why?
From: Larry Fenske <LFenske@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:01:51 -0600
In-reply-to: <tencent_66C345191B9B49B92956F243@qq.com>
Organization: SGI
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

Your RAID 6 array has an internal bitmap, while your RAID 5 array does not.

- Larry Fenske
SGI signature

Senior Software Engineer
SGI

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Array created by mdadm 3.2 & 3.3 have different array size, why?
  - From: Tide

References:
- Array created by mdadm 3.2 & 3.3 have different array size, why?
  - From: Tide

Prev by Date: Array created by mdadm 3.2 & 3.3 have different array size, why?
Next by Date: raid6check.c patches
Previous by thread: Array created by mdadm 3.2 & 3.3 have different array size, why?
Next by thread: Re: Array created by mdadm 3.2 & 3.3 have different array size, why?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux