Re: feature re-quest for "re-write"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/02/14 10:10, NeilBrown wrote:

This code is obviously too subtle.

Not at all, it's my understanding that is under-developed. I was just looking for something obvious to explain the behaviour others have been reporting where a check won't trigger a re-write of a pending sector if the sector is a p or q rather than data.

If 0 drives have failed, then 's->failed' is 0 (it is the count of failed
drives), and  's->q_failed' is also 0 (it is a boolean flag, and q clearly
hasn't failed as nothing has).
So the first 'if' branch will be followed (as "0 == 0") and check_state set to
check_state_run.
Then as q_failed is still 0 and failed < 2, check_state gets set to
check_state_run_pq.


Got it, thanks for taking the time to set me straight.

Regards,
Brad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux