On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Jonathan Brassow wrote: > 4) kmem_cache_create(name="foo-a") > - This FAILS because kmem_cache_sanity_check colides with the existing > name ("foo-a") associated with the non-removed cache. That should not happen. breakage you see will result. Oh. I see the move to common code resulted in the SLAB checks being used for SLUB. The following patch should fix this. Subject: slab_common: Do not check for duplicate slab names SLUB can alias multiple slab kmem_create_requests to one slab cache to save memory and increase the cache hotness. As a result the name of the slab can be stale. Only check the name for duplicates if we are in debug mode where we do not merge multiple caches. Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> Index: linux/mm/slab_common.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/mm/slab_common.c 2013-09-20 11:49:13.052208294 -0500 +++ linux/mm/slab_common.c 2013-09-21 16:55:23.097131481 -0500 @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ continue; } +#if !defined(CONFIG_SLUB) || !defined(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON) /* * For simplicity, we won't check this in the list of memcg * caches. We have control over memcg naming, and if there @@ -69,6 +70,7 @@ s = NULL; return -EINVAL; } +#endif } WARN_ON(strchr(name, ' ')); /* It confuses parsers */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html