Re: "Missing" RAID devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry for the dup Phil, hit the wrong reply button.

On 5/21/2013 7:02 PM, Phil Turmel wrote:
...
> ...First is /dev/md1, a small (~500m) n-way
> ...as /boot.  The other, /dev/md2, uses
> ...raid10,far3 or raid6.
> 
> I put LVM on top of /dev/md2, with LVs for swap, ... /tmp

Swap and tmp atop an LV atop RAID6?  The former will always RMW on page
writes, the latter quite often will cause RMW.  As you stated your
performance requirements are modest.  However, for the archives, putting
swap on a parity array, let alone a double parity array, is not good
practice.

-- 
Stan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux