Re: 0.90 vs 1.X - Differing behavior for device # during fail/remove/add operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Dusty Mabe <dustymabe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> CentOS 6.3
> 2.6.32-279.19.1
> mdadm-3.2.3-9.el6.x86_64
>
>
> I have noticed that the device number printed in the mdstat file gets
> changed if you fail->remove->add a member device of a 1.X metadata
> array, but for a 0.90 metadata array the device will go back to the
> original value once recovery has finished.
>
>
> Is this by design? I know 1.X version of metadata use dev_roles rather
> than this_disk and the mdp_disk_t structure so maybe it is by design?
>

Hey guys.. Sorry to be a pain. Has anyone seen this before? Is it by
design or a known issue?

Dusty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux