Hi On 04/16/2013 09:52 PM, Robert L Mathews wrote: > I personally don't even trust RAID 6. All our servers use three-disk > RAID 1 setups, with disks from at least two different manufacturers to > prevent against firmware bricking (although this is becoming more and > more difficult as the industry consolidates). The problem I find with RAID1 is that it won't protect you against silent corruptions (same as RAID5). What do you do if you do a through check and both drives claim a data block is valid and intact, but data differs? Do you trust disk1 or disk2? In that respect I think RAID1 is a step into the wrong direction :( Cheers Carsten
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
