Am 24.02.2013 19:33, schrieb Phil Turmel:
On 02/24/2013 01:22 PM, Stone wrote:
Am 24.02.2013 15:15, schrieb Phil Turmel:
On 02/24/2013 02:10 AM, Stone wrote:
e2fsck: aborted
the output have 711mb..
do you ned more examples?
what do you say to case1?
I think you need to see case2. Case #1 isn't very good.
Case #2 ....
same shit different partion.
the logfile have 708mb
:(
Hmm. If one was clearly better than the other, I'd recommend you do
"fsck -y" with it. But they are both ugly. Not extraordinarily bad,
but bad.
I believe you should copy all three complete drives to spares, then try
"fsck -y" with case #1. If it doesn't give you your data, put the
spares in your system and try case #2 with "fsck -y".
If neither case #1 nor case #2 give you (most of) your data, I'm out of
ideas. :-(
Phil
hm ok.
what copy method recommend you?
dd? (the duration is very long)
i think i must buy disks because if i get a pice of my data back than i
copy it to my secound storage and so many space i dont have...
if this is you last idea then i will try this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
