Re: Best practice for large storage?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 14.02.2013 18:48, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > Stable enough where it is being used at Lawrence Livermore Nat'l
> > Labs on
> > a 55PB Lustre resource.
> >
> > I've been using it on a pre-release Lustre 2.4 and I have not had
> > any
> > issues.
> 
> ZFS completely fragments if you've got massive parallel write IO -
> especially with Solaris 11. You'll get only 2..3 MiB/s after some time
> as everything is stored completely random then. So if you don't really
> need these snapshots you shouldn't use ZFS. NILFS is also good for
> snapshots.

This won't be massive parallel I/O, just a fileserver with a limited amount of users. Also, can you document this claim?

Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med xenotyp etymologi. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux