On 14.02.2013 18:48, Jeff Johnson wrote: > Stable enough where it is being used at Lawrence Livermore Nat'l Labs on > a 55PB Lustre resource. > > I've been using it on a pre-release Lustre 2.4 and I have not had any > issues. ZFS completely fragments if you've got massive parallel write IO - especially with Solaris 11. You'll get only 2..3 MiB/s after some time as everything is stored completely random then. So if you don't really need these snapshots you shouldn't use ZFS. NILFS is also good for snapshots. > On 2/14/13 9:39 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >> I don't feel like using the fuse version, but is zfsonlinux really >> stable yet? >> >> ----- Opprinnelig melding ----- >>> Roy, >>> >>> Why not use ZFS on Linux? (http://www.zfsonlinux.org) >>> >>> ZFS on Linux is being merged into the upcoming Lustre 2.4 parallel >>> filesystem release. >>> >>> --Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
