Re: Raid 5 to 6 migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/01/2013 01:49 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> 
> On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 02/01/2013 01:16 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>>>
>>> --layout=preserve will make it an order of magnitude faster. Read "man mdadm"
>>> for more details. (And "man md" to learn about things in general.)
>>
>> But will leave the array "unbalanced"--the 7th drive will never be used
>> for reads in normal (non-degraded) operation--reducing read performance.
> 
> Does this option mean, in effect, the 7th disk is just a parity disk? So, sorta like a hybrid RAID 5/RAID4.

Yes, with just the Q left on the 7th disk.  The remainder of the array
is the normal raid5 stripe.  See the manpage for the layout
"left-symmetric-6".

Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux