Re: Raid 5 to 6 migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 02/01/2013 01:16 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>> 
>> --layout=preserve will make it an order of magnitude faster. Read "man mdadm"
>> for more details. (And "man md" to learn about things in general.)
> 
> But will leave the array "unbalanced"--the 7th drive will never be used
> for reads in normal (non-degraded) operation--reducing read performance.

Does this option mean, in effect, the 7th disk is just a parity disk? So, sorta like a hybrid RAID 5/RAID4.


Chris Murphy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux