Re: failed raid re-create changed dev size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue Dec 11, 2012 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Andris Berzins wrote:

> Quoting "Robin Hill" <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > 
> > You will likely have lost some data though, as the new superblocks will
> > have overwritten part of the data, so make sure you run a fsck
> > afterwards (start with fsck -n though, to make sure the overall array
> > looks okay first).
> 
> Is it possible that no data was damaged? It is LUKS partition, i
> mapped it and run "fsck -n" on underlying ext3 partition, 
> but fsck returned immediately with status "clean".
> 
By default fsck will just check whether the filesystem is marked as
dirty/clean and just skip running if it's clean. You'll need to use "-f"
to force it to run.

Cheers,
    Robin
-- 
     ___        
    ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
   / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
  // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |

Attachment: pgphBxrH9uva8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux