Re: failed raid re-create changed dev size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Andris Berzins wrote:
> 
>> I found on internet that this can be fixed if I re-create raid with the same
>> configuration, but with dead drive set as 'missing'.
> 
> This is extremely dangerous. You would have been better off by first
> trying --assemble --force.
> 
>> However, I can not mount md1 and looks like it contains random data. The
>> order is correct. However, I noticed that new raid device size is
>> different from old one.
> 
> Your data offset is different, most likely you're not using the same mdadm
> version as was initially used to create the raid. Mdadm defaults have
> changed over time regarding chink size, data offset and others.

Thank you!
I did not notice that.
Looks that I will have to try downgrade kernel:
http://serverfault.com/questions/427683/what-parameters-to-mdadm-to-re-create-md-device-with-payload-starting-at-
0x2200


> 
> I don't know off the top of my head how to change the mdadm data offset
> unfortunately.
> 
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux