Re: 3TB drives failure rate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Rainer Fügenstein wrote:

what is your experience with 3TB drives, WD and others?

I have some experience with the 2TB Green drives, the ones I bought right after launch had a very high failure rate, the ones I got as replacement and purchased 6-12 months after launch, have fared a lot better.

I am however replacing them now with WD Red drives (only one so far, had my first failure in a year a few months back). The raid resync went very smoothly, I had constant 130 megabyte/s write speed to that 2TB Red drive during the resync.

As for people still talking RAID5 for these sized drives, I don't understand anyone not running RAID6. The rated read error rate on the drives are frightening (10^-14), so with single drive failure and doing resync, it's not uncommon to get read errors. RAID6 is definitely recommended.

<www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/why-raid-5-stops-working-in-2009/162>

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux