Re: [mdadm PATCH] bcache: add bcache superblock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 May 2012, Dan Williams wrote:

> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mark Hills <mark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 May 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> >> This is a hybrid proposal for supporting bcache as a md device.
> >> Somewhat similar to the v1.x metadata format, where array assembly is
> >> handled in userspace, but managed in the kernel.  In the bcache case it
> >> is an "external" metadata format, but then the expectation is that the
> >> kernel "bcache" personality takes over runtime maintenance of the
> >> metadata.
> >
> > I am having some trouble with this, can you clarify (perhaps by example)
> > how to create a pairing of a cache and backing device?
[...]
> >  # make-bcache -C /dev/sdb
> >  # make-bcache -B /dev/sdc
> >  # mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
> >  mdadm: Cannot assemble mbr metadata on /dev/sdb
> 
> I should have been more explicit in the changelog.  This current patch
> was only tested to assemble an existing bcache configuration.  I.e. it
> assumes the backing device has been attached to the cache set at least
> once.  By default make-bcache always creates a new cache-set id per
> invocation.  So in the above example it won't find sdb and sdc belong
> to the same md device because the cache-set id's differ.  You can
> verify this with mdadm -E.

Thanks for explaining. I suppose this is just expecially awkward at the 
moment because attaching the devices can't be done without a different 
kernel.

So it will be good to see the "create" support, when it is ready.

> [..]
> >
> > Maybe I missed something basic here, but I'm afraid can't see what? If
> > not, hopefully this information is useful.
> >
> > I use bcache v13 patches and the MD conversion, and this patch to mdadm.
> 
> For reference:
> 
> [root@fedora-virt ~]# mdadm -E /dev/vd[bc]
> /dev/vdb:
>        Magic : <bcache>
>      Version : 3
>         Role : cache
>     Set UUID : e8670bc3:974b489c:aeb68ea1:d1adf6d1
>   Cache Devs : 1
>  Device UUID : a1b25e26:5a4c4db6:2716c1aa:eba44ec7
>        Flags : sync
>       Policy : lru
>        Label :
>  Device Size : 16776192 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
>  Bucket Size : 1024
>  Num Buckets : 16384
>     this dev : 0
> First Bucket : 1
>     Checksum : 45fa97cda53b0b6 correct
> /dev/vdc:
>        Magic : <bcache>
>      Version : 1
>         Role : backing-device
>     Set UUID : e8670bc3:974b489c:aeb68ea1:d1adf6d1
>   Cache Devs : 1
>  Device UUID : 7045ff87:aa4b13c4:670d8bb2:0b4ad628
>        Flags : sync
>        State : clean
>         Mode : writeback
>        Label :
>  Device Size : 16776192 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
>  Bucket Size : 1024
>  Num Buckets : 16384
>     this dev : 0
> First Bucket : 1
>     Checksum : f36910e51451d91c correct

Presumably there's a little more too this, as I can't even investigate the 
UIDs in use:

  # make-bcache -C /dev/sdb
  [...]
  # make-bcache -B /dev/sdc
  [...]
  # mdadm -E /dev/sd[bc]
  /dev/sdb:
     MBR Magic : aa55
  /dev/sdc:
     MBR Magic : aa55

I confirmed that I'm using the patched mdadm, but it still doesn't seem to 
recognise the magic.

But, of course, I understand this is all work in progress. So this isn't a 
complaint at all, I am just looking forward to code in this area and happy 
to test where I can.

Thanks

-- 
Mark

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux