Re: MD devnode still present after 'remove' udev event, and mdadm reports 'does not appear to be active'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:03:14 +0200 Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Thanks, Neil.
> To end this long email thread: what is "more important": update time
> or event count? Or perhaps they are updated simultaneously?
> 

They are updated simultaneously.

There is no sense that one is more important than the other, but if you know
something about the recent history of the array, then combining that
knowledge with these details might provide you with more precise information
of some sort.

NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux