Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Lennart Poettering
<lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 16:54, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidjaar@xxxxxxx) wrote:
>
>> >> a) mdmon is perfectly capable of restarting, it is already used to
>> >> take over mdmon launched in initrd. The problem is to know when to
>> >> restart - i.e. when respective libraries are changed. This is a job
>> >> for package management in distribution. It is already employed for
>> >> glibc, systemd and some others and can just as well be employed for
>> >> mdmon. And this is totally unrelated to systemd :)
>> >
>> > Really, you are sying there is a synchronous way to make mdmon reexec
>> > itself? How does that work?
>> >
>>
>> I am not sure whether it qualifies as synchronous, but "mdmon
>> --takeover" will kill any existing mdmon for this and start monitoring
>> itself.
>
> I wonder if this is really fully synchronous, i.e. that a) there is no
> point in time where mdmon is not running during this restart and b) the
> mdmom --takeover command returns when the new daemon is fully up, and
> not right-away.
>
>> > Well, the root file systems cannot be unmounted, only remounted.
>> >
>> > So, is there a way to invoke mdmon so that it flushes all metadata
>> > changes to disk and immediately terminates then this should be all we
>> > need for a clean solution. We'd then shutdown the normal instances of
>> > mdmon down like any other daemon and simply invoke this metadata
>> > flushing command as part of late shutdown.
>>
>>
>> Hmm ... it looks like you just need to
>>
>> start mdmon
>> do mdadm --wait-clean
>>
>> After this you can kill mdmon again (assuming decide is no more in
>> use).
>
>
> Well, it would be nice if the md utils would offer something doing this
> without spawning multiple processes and killing them again.
>

/me wonders why his raid5 resyncs every boot on Fedora 15 and has
found this old thread.

I'm tempted to:

1/ teach ignore_proc() to scan for pid files in /dev/md/ (MDMON_DIR on Fedora)
2/ arrange for mdadm --wait-clean --scan to be called after all
filesytems have been mounted read only

...but a few things strike me.  This does not seem to be what was
being proposed above.  Systemd does not treat dm devices like a
service and takes care to shut them down explicitly (but in that case
there is an api that it can call).  Is it time for a libmd.so,  so
systemd can invoke the "--wait-clean --scan" process itself?  Probably
simpler to just SIGTERM mdmon and wait for it.

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux