On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 10:54 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Krzysztof Adamski wrote: > > > One requirement is to partition the drives at 99% for the RAID. > > Why? What problem are you solving by using partitions? > There are at least two, you get to control the size of the area used instead of depending the size of the drive, if in the future you change a drive with a different make/model that is a bit smaller, you don't have problems then. You can store extra information in a second partition that may help you with future recovery. When you have lots of drives in a box (20 to 30) it makes it easy to tell a new drive from an existing drive by looking at the partition table. You can't count on device names in case of problems, since usually you would have to reboot the box specially when it hangs. This are just a few that I can think of from my experience managing boxes with lots of drives and MD RAID for more then last 10 years. I know that the only downside is that the partitions have to be correctly aligned for the 4K drives, I don't know of any other reasons not to use partitions. K -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
