Re: RAID1 question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 08:15:27AM +0200, Kai Stian Olstad wrote:
> On 29. sep. 2011 21:37, William Thompson wrote:
> > The reason I asked this was because a mirrored pair that I currently have is
> > 0.90 version and I was going to use 1.0
> 
> You'll find information about going from 0.90 to 1.0 in the archive,
> take a look at these links:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/34014/focus=34029
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/34424/focus=34441

I'll look at those when I have time.  In this specific case, I do not care
if the data is destroyed.  Just wanted to know if the disks would still be
in sync.

For the sync part, I don't believe it would really matter which metadata
version I used, the disks would be in sync except for areas where the old
metadata was stored.  Am I right on this?  That is assuming RAID1.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux