Re: potentially lost largeish raid5 array..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On September 23, 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/23/2011 12:10 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > I /really really/ wish the driver for this card was more stable, but you
> > deal with what you've got (in my case a $100 2 port SAS/8 port SATA
> > card).
> 
> Please don't shield the identity of the problem card.  Others need to
> know of your problems.  An educated guess tells me it is one of...
> 
> Card:    SuperMicro AOC-SASLP-MV8            Marvell 88SE6480
> Driver:  MVSAS

*DING**DING**DING**DING**DING*

We have a winner! It's a very nice card when it works.

> Card:    HighPoint RocketRAID 2680/2680SGL   Marvell 88SE6485
> Driver:  MVSAS
> 
> This ASIC/driver combo is so historically horrible with Linux that I'm
> surprised all the owners haven't had a big bon fire party and thrown all
> the cards in.  Or simply Ebay'd them to Windows users, where they seem
> to work relatively OK.
> 
> Solve your problem with a 50% more $$ LSI SAS1068E based Intel 8 port
> PCIe x4 SAS/SATA HBA, which uses the mptsas driver:
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816117157
> 
> It seems this is the card most users switch to after being burned by the
> cheap Marvell based SAS 2xSFF8087 cards.  The 1068E cards and the mptsas
> driver are far more reliable, stable, and faster.  Many OEM cards from
> IBM, Dell, etc, use this chip and can be had on Ebay for less than the
> new retail Intel card.  In your situation I'd probably buy new Intel
> just in case.  Hope this info/insight helps.

I'd love to switch, but I didn't really have the money for the card then, and 
now I have less money. I suppose if I ebayed this card first, and then bought a 
new one that would work out, but yeah, It will have to wait a bit (things are 
VERY tight right now).

So this Intel card, looks like a good option, but how much faster is it? I get 
500MB/s read off this SASLP. Probably a bit more now that there's 7 drives in 
the array. Off of XFS, it gets at least 200MB/s read (the discrepancy between 
raw and over xfs really bugs me, something there can't be right can it?).

Thank you for the suggestion though, I will have to book mark that link.

-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux