On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Pim Zandbergen <P.Zandbergen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/01/2011 06:31 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: >> >> Why is your raid metadata using this old version? mdadm-3.2.2-6.fc15 will >> not create this version of raid array by default. There is a reason we have >> updated to a new superblock. > > As you may have seen, the array was created in 2006, and has gone through > several similar grow procedures. > >> Does this problem still occur if you use a newer superblock format (one of >> the version 1.x versions)? > > I suppose not. But that would destroy the "evidence" of a possible bug. > For me, it's too late, but finding it could help others to prevent this > situation. > If there's anything I could do to help find it, now is the time. > > If the people on this list know enough, I will proceed. > > Thanks, > Pim I ran into this exact problem some weeks ago. I don't recall any error or warning messages about growing the array to use 3TB partitions and Neil acknowledge that this was a bug. He also gave instructions on how to recover from this situation and re-start the array using 1.0 metadata. Here is Neil's comment from that thread: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Oopps. That array is using 0.90 metadata which can only handle up to 2TB devices. The 'resize' code should catch that you are asking the impossible, but it doesn't it seems. You need to simply recreate the array as 1.0. i.e. mdadm -S /dev/md5 mdadm -C /dev/md5 --metadata 1.0 -l1 -n2 --assume-clean Then all should be happiness. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- Simon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
