On Tuesday 19 of July 2011 22:48:19 Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:35:26 +0200 > Well, this basically tells you what you already know - a part of the data > you have was corrupted. In this case I think it's 3184 512-byte sectors, > which is about 1.6MB total. the number seems too low to me, I have about 2000 video files larger than 1GB on that array, and every one i tried has been corrupted enough to create almost unstoppable visual artifacts in hi-def video. > How it got there and how to prevent that from > happening in the future - that's a whole different question. would ZFS in raidz2 mode be much better than raid6+ext4? I understand its not the topic of this list, but file-level checksummed rebuild looks like a nice feature -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
