> > "mdadm --monitor" does not monitor RAID0 or Linear arrays. There is > > nothing > > to see. Nothing can fail, they don't rebuilt, they are really just AID, > > not > > RAID. I've been thinking about this. It's true they are just AID, but they most certainly can fail. If the array truly disappears, perhaps because a drive fails, I certainly should be notified of it. > That would make sense if I had started the monitor deamon and it had > sent the e-mail, but the monitor has been running for nearly two days, > since > the system was rebooted. Why send the message nearly a day after the > deamon > is started, and why send it more than once (for each array)? > > By the same token, why did it wait nearly 8 hours and then again > more than a day and a half after the array was created to send the > messages, > instead of immediately after it was created? > > This suggests I am going to be treated to a pair of spurious e-mails > every day or so telling me the device has disappeared, when it is > perfectly > good. After a few months of that, what happens when one of the devices > really does disappear? We all know what happens to the system that cries, > "Wolf!" all the time. Yeah, it looks like it's going to send this message out once a day for both arrays. Mdadm sent out another pair of e-mails at 07:44 this morning. Is no one else seeing this with RAID0 arrays? Is there some way I can stop it without impacting any real notifications? I could intercept the message in the script run by mdadm to send the e-mail, but if I do, I fear I might also incorrectly trash a real error message. I don't suppose "Wrong-Level" would ever appear in a valid notification for a properly configured system, would it? If not, I suppose I could grep for "Wrong-Level" in the e-mail packet and trash it if the text is found. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html