Re: wish for Linux MD mirrored raid types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:26:52PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2011, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> 
> >I am proposing that we call our raid10 layout types for RAID1 - in 
> >accordance with SNIA standards, and in accordance with the common 
> >understanding as demonstrated by you and others, even here on the 
> >linux-raid kernel mailing list.
> 
> Just so we're clear, if I create a raid1 with 4 drives I want 4 identical 
> copies of the same information, not RAID1+0.
> 
> How should this be handled with your suggestion?

With parameters like the ones that we use today for raid10. Something
like

mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=1 -n 4 --layout=c4 /dev/sd[abcd]1 

assuming a new layout type "classic" abbreviated as "c". "n4" could also
do for the layout value.

best regards
keld
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux