On 24/04/11 22:25, Rudy Zijlstra wrote:
On 04/24/2011 10:00 PM, David Brown wrote:
But there is also no doubt that the MegaCli command line tool is
absolutely terrible in comparison to mdadm. It is downright
user-unfriendly. I haven't bothered with the LSI gui tools - they are
useless on a server, where there is no place for X. The "webbios" bios
setup is okay, but only available when rebooting the machine - it's
fine for the initial setup. So the only real tool that will work over
a ssh session while the system is running, is MegaCli. Since it is
statically linked it works with any system, which is nice. But the
interface is painfully unclear, sadistically inconsistent, and badly
documented. If an emergency situation arose, I could explain mdadm and
dictate commands over the phone to a backup admin - there's not a
chance I could do that with MegaCli.
You can run the GUI on a different machine then the raid is on. The SW
contains a "server" app and the X client side. The server app needs to
run on the actual server, the GUI can run on any network connected machine.
I may not have read all the information correctly, but it seemed to me
that I had the choice of installing the client only, or everything -
meaning installing the gui client on the server as well. Maybe I'll
give it a try at some point.
However, realistically speaking I hope and expect that I won't need to
do much with the raid anyway. It's set up, and the chances are that it
will continue to run for years without problems. My aim with MegaCli
was that I would be able to handle something like a disk replacement, or
perhaps growing the raid, without taking the server offline during the
whole process (I don't mind a reboot or two, as long as the rebuild
itself can run while the server is online). So MegaCli is good enough
for that.
I guess it just struck me as strange that MegaCli is so awkward. A
quick google search shows I am not alone - others describe it as "the
most cryptic command line utility in existence" (I wouldn't go that
far), and that MegaRAID Storage Manager is a "java based monster that
nobody really wants to have on a server". The card itself is fine - and
I've heard nothing but good opinions of it. Surely a company that can
make such good cards could make better software to let admins work with
them in the way they want?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
