Re: iostat with raid device...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:57:34 -0700 Linux Raid Study
<linuxraid.study@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If I use --assume-clean in mdadm, I see performance is 10-15% lower as
> compared to the case wherein this option is not specified. When I run
> without --assume_clean, I wait until mdadm prints "recovery_done" and
> then run IO benchmarks...
> 
> Is perf drop expected?

No.  And I cannot explain it.... unless the array is so tiny that it all fits
in the stripe cache (typically about 1Meg).

There really should be no difference.

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux