Re: iostat with raid device...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Robin,

Thanks. So, the uneven (unequal) distribution of Wrtie/Sec numbers in
the iostat output are ok...is that correct?

Thanks.

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Linux Raid Study wrote:
>
>> What I'm not sure of is if the device is newly formatted, would raid
>> recovery happen? What else could explain difference in the first run
>> of IO benchmark?
>>
> When an array is first created, it's created in a degraded state - this
> is the simplest way to make it available to the user instantly. The
> final drive(s) are then automatically rebuilt, calculating the
> parity/data information as normal for recovering a drive.
>
> Cheers,
> Â ÂRobin
> --
> Â Â ___
>  Â( ' }   |    Robin Hill    Â<robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
> Â / / ) Â Â Â| Little Jim says .... Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â|
> Â// !! Â Â Â | Â Â Â"He fallen in de water !!" Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â |
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux