On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 23:44:01 +0000
Mathias BurÃn <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Controller device @ pci0000:00/0000:00:16.0/0000:05:00.0 [sata_mv]
> SCSI storage controller: HighPoint Technologies, Inc. RocketRAID
> 230x 4 Port SATA-II Controller (rev 02)
> host6: [Empty]
> host7: /dev/sde ATA SAMSUNG HD204UI {SN: S2HGJ1RZ800964 }
> host8: /dev/sdf ATA WDC WD20EARS-00M {SN: WD-WCAZA1000331}
> host9: /dev/sdg ATA SAMSUNG HD204UI {SN: S2HGJ1RZ800850 }
Does this controller support PCI-E 2.0? I doubt it.
Does you Atom mainboard support PCI-E 2.0? I highly doubt it.
And if PCI-E 1.0/1.1 is used, these last 3 drives are limited to 250 MB/sec.
in total, which in reality will be closer to 200 MB/sec.
> It's all SATA 3Gbs. OK, so from what you're saying I should see
> significantly better results on a better CPU? The HDDs should be able
> to push 80MB/s (read or write), and that should yield at least 5*80 =
> 400MB/s (-1 for parity) on easy (sequential?) reads.
According to the hdparm benchmark, your CPU can not read faster than 640
MB/sec from _RAM_, and that's just plain easy linear data from a buffer. So it
is perhaps not promising with regard to whether you will get 400MB/sec reading
from RAID6 (with all the corresponding overheads) or not.
--
With respect,
Roman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
