Re: raid over ethernet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 04:42:16AM -0200, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> is it better than nbd+mdadm?

Definitely. We are using drbd replicated disks on a _lot_ of machines,
with all kinds of outside events: disk failures, network failures,
machine failures of various interesting variants. Despite this kind of
pounding, drbd turned out to be very robust, with data loss happening
very rarely (well, with some combined failures you are just plain
screwed - that's why one has backups).

Kind regards,
           Alex.
-- 
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and
 looks like work."                                      -- Thomas A. Edison
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux