Re: support for external persistent cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



yes, a jornaling but using ssd first and sata after
it´s not raid feature...
it´s per disk filesystem feature...
we could implement jornaling in raid too...
but´s more inteligent (easy) at application level (filesystem)
you could write first at network (if it´s faster than sata) and after
at sata (if it´s slower than network)

it´s not a raid feature... it´s a per device feature got it?
maybe a device (not raid..) for a cache division on devices
for example


/dev/sda (sata 1terabyte 100mb/s)
/dev/sdb (ssd 1gigabyte 1000mb/s)

/dev/cache_a (a mix of sata and ssd with sata size 1terabyte, and
mixed speed (memory, ssd, sata))

cache_a device should know that
early reads/write should be writen to sdb
time in time it should sync at sda

the same happens with memory (ram memory) but it´s volatille (diferent
than ssd that´s not volatille)

/dev/sdb should be sync
/dev/sda should be async (since /dev/sdb make it safe to use async)


that´s you intention? i don´t know if linux have it, anyone know?


2011/1/19 Cory Coager <ccoager@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:16:08PM -0200, Roberto Spadim wrote:
>> ok, your hardware have:
>> cpu, memory, disk controller, disks
>>
>> and you computer have:
>> cpu, memory, disk controler (your hardware)
>>
>> if your computer cache don?t sync to your disk controller you will
>> lose information....
>>
>> check that *memory, is the volatille memory and *disk controller is
>> the non volatille memory
>> if you tell me that you will never have a *memory, and you have always
>> a non volatille memory, no problem, you will never need a kernel
>> load... just a boot loader that read previous memory information and
>> start in that point... why don?t do this? non volatille memory is not
>> as fast as volatille memory
>> got the problem?
>
> Sorry, we're still not on the same page.  I would use both a ramdisk
> and sata disk.  The ramdisk would act as a persistent cache
> (with the battery) for the sata disks.  Enabling write through
> would write to the cache first then sync to the sata disks.
>
> Understand what I'm getting at now?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Roberto Spadim
Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux