md-raid and block sizes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, 
  With the advent of the WD*EARS drives and the "advanced partitioning"
system that requires 4k blocks, I wanted to pop a quick question to see
how the md metadata is aligned and how it should be aligned to get
proper performance out of the devices.

So, For raid1,  I'll assume there is some metadata-overhead on the
drives, how large is this block? Will there be need to make a partition
on the md-device in order to get proper alignment of filesystem =>
platters?

for both raid1 and 5/6 levels, what are the appropiate stride-sizes for
ext3/4?

For more advanced raid configurations (5-6), how should the ext3/4
stripe size be configured?


Yes, a lot of similarly naive questions, however, I'm asking mostly
because of how devices are changing from 512 to 4k sized blocks, with
quite interesting changes in performance, and I wanted to figure out
what is the current state of software raid. At which "level" of the
stack: (partition) raid (partition) filesystem ,  do you have to account
for the block sizes in order to not degrade performance of the devices.

( In a perfect world I'd be able to purchase a stack of the devices and
test for myself and come back with a report. However, money and hardware
is a scarce resource ;)

ps.  please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed to the list.


// Spider


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux