Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for Incremental()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:16:58 +0100 Przemyslaw Czarnowski
<przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The following series consists of two fixes for problems revealed during the tests 
> of autorebuild. First one is quite important, as recovery process do not start
> if bare disk is added to degraded array via incremental. Second one is just
> a change in return value of array_try_spare().
> 
> ---
> 
> Przemyslaw Czarnowski (2):
>       fix: adding spare via incremental do not trigger recovery
>       fix: incremental for bare disks return invalid value

Both applied,
Thanks,

NeilBrown

> 
> 
>  Incremental.c |   11 ++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux