You have a degraded array now with 1 disk down. If you proceed, more disks might pop out due to errors. It's best to backup your data, run a check on the array, fix it then try to resume the reshape. On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello everyone. > >  I was just growing one of my RAID6 arrays from 13 to 14 > members. The array growth had passed its critical stage and had been > growing for several minutes when the system came to a screeching halt. It > hit the big red switch, and when the system rebooted, the array assembled, > but two members are missing. One of the members is the new drive and the > other is the 13th drive in the RAID set. Of course, the array can run well > enough with only 12 members, but itâs definitely not the best situation, > especially since the re-shape will take another day and a half. Is it best > I go ahead and leave the array in its current state until the re-shape is > done, or should I go ahead and add back the two failed drives? > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at Âhttp://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html --   Â Majed B. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
