On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:01:11PM +0700, hansbkk@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> - I am not at this point overly concerned about performance issues - > >> reliability/redundancy and ease of recovery are my main priorities. > > > > In that case, I'm not sure about your desire for the additional > > complexity. Someone else suggested RAID6, which from an operational > > standpoint is much simpler. The main reason, it seems to me, for the more > > complex topologies would be enhancing perfromance. > > I can see how RAID6 is simpler than RAID10, but compared to RAID1? Hmm, does not compute by me. RAID1 and RAID10 are the same in complexity, RAID10 is just a modern RAID1, and should actually have been called RAID1. best regards keld -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
