>From 4d1f9e34397a7e9f0af8a68025a9f9e76ead57c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anna Czarnowska <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:31:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Monitor: array that has disappeared doesn't need spares
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, Ciechanowski, Ed <ed.ciechanowski@xxxxxxxxx>
If a degraded array disappears we still have it in statelist
with active<raid but it is pointless to look for spares for it.
Signed-off-by: Anna Czarnowska <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Monitor.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Monitor.c b/Monitor.c
index b78a66b..0a7c25f 100644
--- a/Monitor.c
+++ b/Monitor.c
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static void try_spare_migration(struct state *statelist, struct alert_info *info
link_containers_with_subarrays(statelist);
for (st = statelist; st; st = st->next)
if (st->active < st->raid &&
- st->spare == 0) {
+ st->spare == 0 && !st->err) {
struct domainlist *domlist = NULL;
int d;
struct state *to = st;
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
