I created a new array after upgrading kernel and OS
(2.6.32.25-cracauer and Debian/squeeze, respectively, resulting in
mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010)
The new array reads
md0 : active raid5 sdc2[4] sda2[2] sdb2[1] sdd2[0]
292998144 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 256k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU]
I figure the "super 1.2" means the new version of the superblock.
Can I read that array if I ever connect the machine to an older
kernel/mdadm? I see that I can control which version to use in
mdadm(8), but I don't get what the advantage of the new format is if I
don't run out of # of components or total capacity. I can see how
storing the superblock at 4 KB makes it more robust against accidents
that wipe out of the first 512 bytes or similar fun. I think storing
it at the end will be a pain if you ever have to hexdump recover the
thing, no?
I also wonder why this is the only version announced in /proc/mdstat
if it is what is now the default? Shouldn't it announce the v0.9
blocks?
Is anybody here using the DDF format? I don't plan to get hardware
raid but why not prepare for it?
Thanks
Martin
--
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <cracauer@xxxxxxxx> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
