Re: some non critical problems... (1. mdadm segfault -> write-mostly, 2. smart?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Janek Kozicki wrote:
Janek Kozicki said:     (by the date of Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:15 +0200)

Umm... to reiterate one of my questions in above email:


md1 : active raid1 sdc1[3](W) sdb1[5](W)
       9767416 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU]
       bitmap: 6/150 pages [24KB], 32KB chunk
Is it possible to disable that (W) --write-mostly flag? Does it
decrease performance or something, if both devices in the array are
set to (W) ?
this seems to have fixed it:

  mdadm --fail /dev/md1 /dev/sdb1
  mdadm --remove /dev/md1 /dev/sdb1
  mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sdb1
  mdadm --add --readwrite /dev/md1 /dev/sdb1


Sorry for a late question, but in adding this to my notes, I realized I wasn't clear on why this flag moved to the other partitions. Are you, and if so can you clarify?


--
Bill Davidsen<davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We can't solve today's problems by using the same thinking we
   used in creating them." - Einstein

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux