On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø <torarnv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thinking that since sdb1 was more or less intact it would be able to > jump in and work together with sdc1 and sde1 to form a degraded array > I could pull data off of. Here's a paste of the mdadm -E state of things before this happened: http://pastebin.com/f46EWXEA I notice the event count has gone up since then, does this indicate that sdb1 will be too old (non-fresh) to be usable? Perhaps I'll have more luck assembling the array with the known-faulty sdd1 with a little bit of file corruption, or perhaps it was just failing temporarily and got kicked just to be safe? Tor Arne -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
