Re: [mdadm PATCH 0/2] two 3.1.3 regression fixes (incremental assembly)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:46:38 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Neil,
> 
> The mdadm -I --no-degraded option needs to be acceptable for some time
> to come, do you have a policy for when deprecated options can be scheduled for
> removal?  The error code for -I shall be zero in the 'not enough' case to
> restore the correct and established pre-3.1.3 behavior.

No, I don't have a policy.  Given that this was introduced fairly recently I
don't feel a need to keep it around for very long.  I'd probably be happy to
see in go in 12 months, or with mdadm-v4.0, whichever is first.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux