On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:40:46 -0700 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8/10/2010 9:46 AM, Williams, Dan J wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > > The mdadm -I --no-degraded option needs to be acceptable for some time > > to come, do you have a policy for when deprecated options can be scheduled for > > removal? The error code for -I shall be zero in the 'not enough' case to > > restore the correct and established pre-3.1.3 behavior. > > > > Also available via git: > > > > git://github.com/djbw/mdadm.git master > > > > --- > > > > Dan Williams (2): > > Incremental: return success in 'container not enough' case > > Incremental: accept '--no-degraded' as a deprecated option > > Note, both of these should have been tagged: > > Reported-by: Ignacy Kasperowicz <ignacy.kasperowicz@xxxxxxxxx> > > If you take the patches directly. Thanks, I've taken both and added that line. I'm beginning to think we should treat 3.1.3 like an -rc and do a 3.1.4 soon with all these little fix-ups... NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
